[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:34:12 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) |
>>>>> "Samium" == Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
Samium> 1. You create the patch with that funny contract applied
Samium> 2. the custiomer downloads the clean kernel
Samium> 3. the customer downloads your patch, and therefore accepts your
funny contract
Samium> 4. the customer creates the work by applying the patch
According to rms, doesn't work. This is precisely the way the Aladdin
Ghostscript + GNU readline setup worked. The FSF legal staff argued
that since the patch is clearly intended to be applied to the GPLed
work, it implicitly creates a derived work.
Not tested in court, so who knows. (Under threat of court action,
Aladdin backed down; the GNU readline extension is only used by
interactive end users, so it didn't have any positive effect on
Aladdin's revenues.)
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Anselm Lingnau, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Miles Bader, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Adam Sampson, 2003/11/20