[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:10:00 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
Thanks for working on this, by the way.
> patch-1
> add SHA1 to checksums, verify it [INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE]
> I was fairly verbose in the patch-1 patch log. In case [INCOMPATIBLE
> CHANGE] isn't clear enough - yes, you will have to re-checksum and
> re-sign your archives.
We should be able to eliminate that limitation, I think.
(Assuming I do merge in SHA1 support, then) I don't mind leaving md5.c
linked in. Is your opinion that md5 security is _so_ bad that
revisions currently using it should be changes? Or would it be
enough to just use sha1 on new revisions?
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Thomas Zander, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Karel Gardas, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Florian Weimer, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/06