[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward comp
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:22:53 -0500 |
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 10:56, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Well, not much we can do about this. the older tla wasn't robust in
> > it's checksums parsing :[.
>
> Which means that once Tom himself uses this patch, older versions of
> tla won't be able to check out tla sources.
Only tla 1.2pre0 will have a problem. 1.1 and any earlier version will
work fine. No cause for panic.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Robert Collins, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Tom Lord, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Robert Collins, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: HEADS UP: checksums change is not backward compatible, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/20