[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:45:47 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Samuel Tardieu <address@hidden>
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > 1. Checksum data can be reliably extracted from them by tla
> > _even_if_ the user has no ~/.arch-params/.../*.check file for the
> > relevent archive.
> > 2. They are "all in one" -- tla can read them, along with the
> > signature, in a single file-fetch from the archive. In other words,
> > detached signatures are not an option.
> Wouldn't a tar file with checksums + detached signatures achieve what
> you want? It does 1, it does 2, and it fixes the flaws that were
> identified.
You're correct that that satisfies the requirements. On the other
hand, it seems rather heavyweight and it would require using the
filesystem to invoke .check and signing scripts.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Miles Bader, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Robert Collins, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] signatures and checking, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/26