Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Gnu-arch-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 51

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 07:35, Pierce T.Wetter III wrote:
> >> doesn't currently have any concept of a "master" repository, I think 
> >> it
> >> makes sense that the high-level commands would support this concept
> >> that you have local archives you can commit to all the time, with a
> >> remote archive you commit to less often.
> >
> > Impractical. It won't make sense for most people. This sort of thing
> > is acutely site-specific.
> 
>   Hmmm... For most projects, it would seem to me that contributing 
> changes towards
> a master build would make a lot of sense.

Most projects have a very low ratio of developers to
developers-that-can-do-arbitrary-things-to-HEAD.


So in many (most?) projects most developers won't have access to commit
to 'HEAD', but with Arch's distributed nature they will now have access
to use revision control...

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part