[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] {archives} vs archives
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] {archives} vs archives |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:35:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:49:30AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> What do people normally use?
For local use: ~/arch/address@hidden [etc]
In public_html: .../address@hidden
> I like to have naming conventions, I like the visual effect of { and }.
Note that while { and } are a good thing in the case of {arch} in project
trees -- because {arch} is a fixed name, they guard against namespace
collisions with the source-tree directories -- they're just annoying noise in
most other places; I don't know why some people starting using them for the
parent directory of their archives, but I wish they would stop. For your
archive dirs, you can pick any name you want, so why not pick something nice?
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.