[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch log - blank last line?
From: |
Charles Duffy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch log - blank last line? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:15:59 -0500 |
Convention is to put only very brief text in "Summary", and then longer
text following the blank line after the initial headers -- it's kind of
RFC2822-style.
Here's an example of one entry from "tla changelog" output:
> 2003-12-17 17:29:05 GMT Charles Duffy <address@hidden> patch-71
>
> Summary:
> Always use rlog
> Revision:
> cscvs--experimental--1.1--patch-71
>
> David Allouche appears to have found a bug related to cscvs generating
> different output based on tree state. To eliminate any dependence on
> such state, "rlog" is always used rather than "log", and a separate set
> of methods are called by the cache command to determine how to treat
> remote rlog-generated paths.
>
> modified files:
> cmds/cache.py
For this, my log file looked as follows:
> Summary: Always use rlog
> Keywords:
>
> David Allouche appears to have found a bug related to cscvs generating
> different output based on tree state. To eliminate any dependence on
> such state, "rlog" is always used rather than "log", and a separate set
> of methods are called by the cache command to determine how to treat
Does that clarify things a bit?