[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:34:29 +0900 |
Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> writes:
>> Both operations are potentially useful, but I think somebody else's
>> suggestion of a `--patch-logs-only' option to replay is a better way to
>> implement what you want.
>
> Or maybe as an option to apply-delta, since it can simulate replay and
> undo. (sync-tree is like undo with logs only)
Maybe that'd be useful too, but certainly not as a replacement for
replay (which is both more convenient and far lighter-weight in this
case)!
I mean it seems that --patch-logs-only and --no-patch-logs are really a
change to `dopatch', and various front-ends that (effectly) use that
should parse and pass-through these options.
-Miles
--
Freedom's just another word, for nothing left to lose --Janis Joplin
- [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Stig Brautaset, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Stig Brautaset, 2004/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Robin Farine, 2004/09/30