[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [UPDATE: merge-65] Clarified help messages for tag
From: |
Matthew Palmer |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [UPDATE: merge-65] Clarified help messages for tag --seal and --fix |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:51:20 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
Archive-URI: http://www.hezmatt.org/~mpalmer/mirrors/address@hidden
Base-Revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--patch-25
Revision: address@hidden/tla--helptext--1.2--patch-1
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:03:32AM -0400, James Blackwell wrote:
> These aren't quite right:
Revisiting it, I'd say they're damned well wrong... I think -0 equivalence
fever caught me.
This is a much better one, I think (as provided in the revised pseudo-header
above; hopefully BugGoo works this time):
--- orig/commands/cmd-tag.c
+++ mod/commands/cmd-tag.c
@@ -46,9 +46,10 @@
OP (opt_no_cacherev, 0, "no-cacherev", 0, \
"Do not cacherev tag even if different archive") \
OP (opt_seal, 0, "seal", 0, \
- "create a version-0 revision") \
+ "create a version-0 revision in TAG-VERSION") \
OP (opt_fix, 0, "fix", 0, \
- "create a versionfix revision") \
+ "create a versionfix revision for the sealed\n") \
+ "branch TAG-VERSION\n") \
OP (opt_setup, "S", "setup", 0, \
"use rchive-setup' if necessary.")
--
"The RFCs say that if you get any 8-bit stuff you're supposed to convert it
into quoted-unreadable..."
-- Phil Hazel, LCA 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature