[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: mail user agent wars was: tla 1.4
From: |
Matthieu Moy |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: mail user agent wars was: tla 1.4 |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:00:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Anand Kumria <address@hidden> writes:
> Or, instead of trying to beat up everyone because their mail user agent
> (MUA) doesn't follow your favourite mail header you could instead follow
> the standard (RFC2822) and set your 'Reply-To:' to the appropriate address
> list.
Where did you read that Reply-To should be used for a global reply ?
I can read from the RFC2822 that :
Note: Some mail applications have automatic reply commands that
include the destination addresses of the original message in the
destination addresses of the reply. How those reply commands behave
is implementation dependent and is beyond the scope of this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
document.
^^^^^^^^
So I guess there's another RFC somewhere that suggests using the
Reply-To for global replies, that you forgot to cite.
Also, I'll follow your recommendation when you'll give me a solution
to make a private reply a message setting the "Reply-to" field to a
list.
--
Matthieu
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Anand Kumria, 2005/01/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Matthew Dempsky, 2005/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Andy Tai, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Jan Hudec, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Milan Cvetkovic, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Jan Hudec, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Milan Cvetkovic, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Milan Cvetkovic, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, John A Meinel, 2005/01/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2005/01/26