[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] Re: bazaar bug #385 (Re: Stabilizing Bazaar
From: |
Robert Widhopf-Fenk |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] Re: bazaar bug #385 (Re: Stabilizing Bazaar?) |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:01:59 +0200 |
On Saturday, July 9, 2005 at 11:16:44, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > My problem comes from a call to arch_archive_connect_branch
> > within arch_build_revision. It was called for an archive
> > which I did not register and thus returned NULL.
>
> Which archive was it?
address@hidden
Below you find how to reproduce my problem.
"tla star-merge" and "baz merge" are certainly not doing the
same, just look at the resulting trees, but my understanding
of "baz merge" was that it is smarter version of "tla star-merge",
and can be used where "tla star-merge" was used.
So using replay or apply-changeset is a workaround, but not
exactly what I want.
Maybe I need a lecture about the differences in merge
algorithms ... :-)
Or is something wrong with my archive?
******************************************************************************
> tla -V
tla tla-1.3-1 from regexps.com
Copyright 2003 Tom Lord
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report bugs to address@hidden
# automatically generated release id (by arch-buildpackage)
tla-1.3-1
> baz -V
baz Bazaar version 1.4.1 (address@hidden/dists--bazaar--1.4[bazaar--devo.cfg])
from Canonical Ltd. and other members of the arch community
Copyright 2004,2005 Canonical Ltd.
Copyright 2003 Tom Lord.
Copyright 2003-2005 Various Contributors
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report bugs to address@hidden
Bazaar version 1.4.1 (address@hidden/dists--bazaar--1.4[bazaar--devo.cfg])
******************************************************************************
# I did the following, but do this only on a test account
# rm -rf xtla--main--1.1--patch-19/ .arch-params/ .arch-cache/
tla register-archive http://www.robf.de/Hacking/arch/2005
tla get address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
cd xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
tla register-archive http://arch.xsteve.at/2005
tla star-merge address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
# success
tla undo
baz merge address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
# you get: baz: uncaught exception: -1:(exiting on botched invariant)
baz undo
cp \{arch}/++default-version
\{arch}/++pristine-trees/unlocked/xtla/xtla--main/xtla--main--1.1/address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19/\{arch}/
baz merge address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
# you get: baz: uncaught exception: -1:(exiting on botched invariant)
baz undo
tla register-archive http://mani.sourceforge.jp/arch/xtla
baz merge address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
# success! (with conflicts)
******************************************************************************
Robert.
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] Re: bazaar bug #385 (Re: Stabilizing Bazaar?), Matthieu Moy, 2005/07/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] Re: bazaar bug #385 (Re: Stabilizing Bazaar?),
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <=