[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?
From: |
Peter Conrad |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:50:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
Hi,
Am Freitag, 21. April 2006 11:27 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>
> GNU Arch is/should be targeting the GNU system.
any software should be targeting its users' needs, not the political
goals of the supporting organization.
From the point of view of the professional user, windows support is
a MUST.
> OTOH,
> `tla' builds on the ability to use long paths, hard links, and so on,
> which Windows doesn't provide. Thus, maybe we should not worry too much
> about Windows for `tla' because porting it there may require
> unacceptably constraining the design.
Hard links are an optimization. tla works (or could work) fine
without them.
Long paths aren't neccessary for a good archive format, so I wouldn't
call the path length an "unacceptable design constraint".
Bye,
Peter
--
Peter Conrad Tel: +49 6102 / 80 99 072
[ t]ivano Software GmbH Fax: +49 6102 / 80 99 071
Bahnhofstr. 18 http://www.tivano.de/
63263 Neu-Isenburg
Germany
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Jeremy Shaw, 2006/04/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/04/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Andy Tai, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?,
Peter Conrad <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Mark Flacy, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Karel Gardas, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/21