[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism
From: |
Dima Krasner |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:15:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Zoho Mail |
---- On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:09:55 +0200 Jean Louis wrote ----
>I really don't see strictness there. And I fully understand that
>somebody who did not research the definitions of words, and in general
>about free software -- that such person may get impression of
>strictness. It requires learning.
Many people who don't know what free software and the FSF are see discussions
like this one and may get the false impression of strictness.
>Finally, the GNU GPL license, the free software world's license, is
>according to media most widely used license for software, in the whole
>world. If so, then those developers did understand the reasons and
>purposes of the free software.
Don't forget more permissive, non-copyleft licenses like MIT and Apache have
conquered the open source scene (e.g. GitHub) and this trend also affects free
software, as a subset of open source software.
When developers run away from free software and the GPL because they don't like
the free software movement's attitude for whatever reason (read: bad first
impression due to TL;DR of fsf.org), we lose man hours and working hands.
>The words debian or things like "-debian" are nowhere forbidden to say
>or mention.
I don't see why a distro cannot put a link to Purism's site on its homepage,
even if it's unclear whether or not it is endorsed by the developers. After
all, Trisquel's packages mention Ubuntu in many places.
>You should put attention on differentiation, and not equation. Not
>everything is equal to everything. Debian GNU/Linux as distribution
>and movement is not equal to things like "-debian".
And putting a link to a site does not mean endorsement.
>Further, with the generalization, you do not bring up arguments.
First impression matters. The FSF has always been bad in PR matters, IMHO.
Again, as I said before: those who don't know the free software movement might
see mailing list threads like this one, their length and the arguments
discussed, then decide the entire free software movement is a bunch of stubborn
people they cannot work with.
Dima
- [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Riley Baird, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Julie Marchant, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jeff F., 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Julie Marchant, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Dima Krasner, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jean Louis, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism,
Dima Krasner <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jean Louis, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Dima Krasner, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jean Louis, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Dima Krasner, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jeff F., 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jean Louis, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Riley Baird, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jeff F., 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Perfectionism, Jeff F., 2016/11/10