Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF

[Ivan Zaigralin]

What you are saying below was also my understanding, Bill, up to very 
recently, because this email from Childebert <address@hidden> , who 
inquired about our status from FSF just a few days ago, seems to offer a 
contradictory assertion:

> Subject: reply FSF
> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2019, 18:36:31
> From: Childebert <address@hidden>
> To: Ivan Zaigralin <address@hidden>
> CC: Matt Samudio <address@hidden>
> 
> Le Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:21:01 -0700,
> Ivan Zaigralin <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> I received the message from the FSF he say this :"With Freenix, a year
> ago an issue was raised on gnu-linux-libre@ that remained unresolved
> there,
> 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2018-07/msg00023.html

Perhaps this is all a result of miscommunication, but either way, FSF's 
official position in this process is one of the things I am trying to 
understand right now.

On Friday, June 21, 2019 17:03:58 bill-auger wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:08:44 -0700 Ivan wrote:
> > Once again, please let us know if there's anything there you
> > see that is in violation of FSDG.
> 
> i think this distro is entirely in the FSF's hands now - shortly
> after the new evaluation procedure was put into place, donald
> immediately moved freenix and libretybsd out of the section:
> "Distros that have requested consideration", and into the
> section: "Distros ready for final review by the FSF", bypassing
> the section: "Distros currently being evaluated by the community"
> 
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki?title=Incoming_distros&type=revision&diff=48277
> &oldid=48254
> 
> as i remember that was because those two distros were considered
> to be already fully evaluated by the community, and would not
> need to go through the new review checklist process; but would
> be immediately eligible for consideration by the FSF
> 
> at this point, if someone from the community found an issue with
> freenix, probably the freenix bug tracker would be the most
> appropriate place to report it - there is probably nothing more
> to discuss on this list, unless it turns out to be some unclear
> edge case that requires discussion, clarification, or consensus
> in order to determine of it is a FSDG problem

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.