[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch
From: |
NOSPAMdave |
Subject: |
Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:41:58 -0000 |
According to Stefaan A Eeckels <tengo@DELETEMEecc.lu>:
> On Sat, 15 May 2004 16:59:08 -0400
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > Are you expecting the laws to be applied differently for different
> > companies? Patents are something that anyone can take advantage of.
> > Little guys can use them to keep big guys from walking all over them.
> > Big guys use them as a way to stay big.
>
> Little guys might not be able to afford patents.
> Does anyone have an idea how much it costs to get
> a software invention patented?
I attended a talk the other day on patents by the former
corporate counsel of a software company. He mentioned
a range of $7K-$60K to get each patent, but noted that
it was probably going to cost at least $500K to fight or
defend a patent in court. That's the more significant
obstacle, but it also works both ways. While it's a
significant obstacle for the little guy trying to defend
against a charge of infringement, even Bill Gates can't
afford to spend $500K swatting every fly that comes along.
So a lot of innocent non-willful infringement is likely
to slip by under the radar. People are only likely
to go to court over a patent if one side or the other
thinks they have millions at stake.
--
Dave Wallace (Remove NOSPAM from my address to email me)
It is quite humbling to realize that the storage occupied by the longest
line from a typical Usenet posting is sufficient to provide a state space
so vast that all the computation power in the world can not conquer it.