Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code

[Paul Jarc]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> So what?  It is irrelevant speculating about a world in which the
> courts followed Alexander's interpretation.

Stefaan asked about motivation.  I tried to answer that question.  If
you're not interested in motivation, feel free to ignore that message.
Note that I am not agreeing with Alexander's argument.

> As you can see with the SCO/IBM court case, even ridiculously far more
> extended claims of derivation and copyright don't get thrown out of
> court.

No argument here.


paul