[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
From: |
Linønut |
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:24:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) |
Error BR-549: MS DRM 1.0 rejects the following post from Alexander Terekhov:
> <quote source=http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
> If you send me the plain text, HTML, or PDF, then I could read it.
> </quote>
"I am puzzled. Why did you choose to send me 876,377 bytes in your recent
message when the content is only 27,133 bytes?
"You sent me five files in the non-standard, bloated .doc format that is
Microsoft's secret, rather than in the international, public, and more
efficient format of plain text."
--
Free as in freedom
Power as in empowerment
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, (continued)
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Chris Croughton, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Nick Kew, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Robert Newson, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?,
Linønut <=
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Hasler, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Winters, 2004/07/19
Message not available
Message not availableRe: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Jason Clifford, 2004/07/19
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Phillips, 2004/07/19