[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question About GNU General Public License
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: Question About GNU General Public License |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:07:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On 2 Aug 2004 13:25:05 -0700, Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg> wrote:
>
> GPL does not try to extend the copyright protection to the other parts
> of the compilation or the collective works, thus there's no misuse of
> copyright. It merely authorizes you to make copies in GPL'ed
> compilations and does not authorize you to make copies in non GPL'ed
> compilations (AIUI).
If that were true, and if a program and the dynamically linked library
that a program used together were a compilation work, how could the GPL
apply to the distribution of the program when the GPL covered library
was not also distributed?
Isaac
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, (continued)
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Momchil Velikov, 2004/08/02
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/02
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Momchil Velikov, 2004/08/03
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, telford, 2004/08/05
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/05
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/06
- Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/08/06
Re: Question About GNU General Public License, Momchil Velikov, 2004/08/02