[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?
From: |
Rui Miguel Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:23:25 +0100 |
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 12:37 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> is compatible with it. It might not be so under jursidiction of
> the GNU Republic (where only Mr President Stallman knows and rules
> what is "compatible"), but who cares?
Your insultuous tone alone removes you any credibility you could have at
the eyes of one who is ignorant of the law.
Because those that have somewhat more insight, see that your arguments
do not apply, because you're talking of a radically different concept
(first sale doctrine) than (re)distribution as if they where the exact
same thing.
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Mike Linksvayer, 2005/04/11
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/12
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?,
Rui Miguel Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/12
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2005/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/12
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2005/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/12
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Mike Linksvayer, 2005/04/12
Message not available
Message not available