[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how much is too much?
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: how much is too much? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2005 22:16:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:41:30 +0200, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> Isaac wrote:
> [...]
>> 17 USC 117 covers modifications required to run programs when one
> ones a copy. IMO that would include linking code to a library,
>
> I don't think so. Think of a "package" in source code - a tarball of
> linked (some modules reference others modules) components. What does
> it have to do with 17 USC 117 as far as preparation and distribution
> of that "package" is concerned? Nothing, I think.
>
Your not using your imagination. 17 USC 117 allows such copying or
adapting as is essential to run the software. IMO that would allow
compiling, installing, and linking to a library presuming that you
owned a legal copy of the source code of the library.
I really didn't suggest anything concerning distribution. I was
talking about doing what you can do own your own system with legally
acquired and owned copies of code.
Isaac
- Re: how much is too much?, (continued)
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, John Hasler, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Isaac, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?,
Isaac <=
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31