[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing question about the BSD
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Licensing question about the BSD |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:08:54 +0200 |
Bruce Lewis wrote:
[...]
> Now you are citing someone who says "Such innovations rarely will
> constitute infringing derivative works under the Copyright Act."
Someone == United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
>
> "Rarely" implies it is possible.
That mild and polite wording doesn't subvert the clear message.
(Hint: "See generally Nadan, supra, at 1667-72.")
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, (continued)
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/03
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, John Hasler, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/04
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Per Abrahamsen, 2005/08/04