[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:19:04 +0100 |
"D.C. Parris" wrote:
[...]
> While I strongly disagree with your opinion of the GPL, I do appreciate the
> link. It is helpful to understand the role of the auto-termination clause
> (assuming the view expressed is accurate). I don't care to get into a
> flame war over the legitimacy of the GPL. It must have at least some
> legitimacy, since its terms have been upheld in more than one case.
Such as... <?> Be warned, I'm a profi. misc.int-property added.
regards,
alexander.
- Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, D.C. Parris, 2006/01/18
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/18
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, D.C. Parris, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, David Kastrup, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, D.C. Parris, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/19