[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:00:06 +0100 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 19:19 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > You ask how a copy would be acquired without accepting the GPL.
>
> Irrelevant. You still don't have the right to make copies and distribute
The right to distribute lawfully made copies (without authority of the
copyright owner) is statutory. 17 USC 109. And license-not-a-contract
fiction just can't interfere with that right. But anyway, if one needs
to distribute multiple copies (no sources, draconian contractual terms
that impose forbearance from the GPL via shrink-wrap or something), one
can simply unrestrictedly download multiple copies (implied license to
save bandwidth aside for a moment). I keep all my download logs in safe
place. ;-)
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lee Hollaar, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/01