[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2006 23:05:57 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 02:10:10 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
> The license _does_ apply. It is you who don't get it. You are saying
> that all companies that have illegal copies of Windows, are not
> breaking the law, since they are `for internal use' and no rules
> apply.
No one is saying that. Copying of windows software is illegal. So
regardless of whether the companies are distributing or not, the activity
you describe would be copyright infringement. You cannot make copies
of Windows software for personal use.
However you can make internal use only copies of GPL software without
exceeding the permissions given by the GPL. It's really that simple.
Isaac
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/06
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/06
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Isaac <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/04
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/04
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/04
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/04
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01