[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: First sale according to Terekov
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: First sale according to Terekov |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:29:34 +0000 |
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:43 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > Let's analyse some situations:
> > 1. You gave B to a friend
> > that's first sale
>
> Right.
>
> > 1.1 your friend sold B to someone else
> > that's first sale
>
> Right.
>
> > 1.2 your friend sold copies of B to other people (B1, B2, etc...)
> > that's no longer first sale, that's distribution of new copies
>
> Wrong. First sale is about distribution of authorized copies by their
> owners. The GPL entitles your friend to make copies and he owns them.
> So it does fall under first sale and only a contractual covenant can
> interfere with your friend's right to distribute all his copies as he
> sees fit under first sale and not the GPL.
It is you who are wrong (but I know you will disagree, there's no point
for you to reply). "Your friend" can only sell B not copies of B (B1,
B2, etc...). That's forbidden under copyright.
> > and that can only be done under the terms of the GNU GPL, the
> > only license that permits those copies. Otherwise, copyright
> > says your friend can't do that.
> >
> > 2. You sell B to someone else
> > that's just like 1.1
>
> Right.
>
> > 2.1 that someone else gives copies of B to other people (B1, B2, etc...)
> > that's just like 1.2
>
> Except that 1.2 is wrong.
Except that *you* are wrong.
> > 3. you give copies of B to other people (B1, B2, etc...)
> > that's just like 1.2
>
> Except that 1.2 is wrong.
Except that *you*`are wrong.
> > Rui
>
> 4. Rui sold or gifted copies of B to Terekhov (B1, B2, etc...). Rui
> was compliant with the GPL and provided access to source code to
> Terekhov. Terekhov is not a party under the GPL agreement regarding
> those copies to begin with, and he may resell those copies under
> first sale ignoring the GPL altogether.
That's where you're wrong. You can't give copies of B under first sale,
just B (your copy).
Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Property according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/12
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07