[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries
From: |
Merijn de Weerd |
Subject: |
Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:22:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) |
On 2006-02-26, Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:59:23 +0200, Daniel Qarras <dqarras@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for being pedantic here but I am considering to use LGPL for a
>> software package that is not a software library in any sense and
>> therefore I would need to know exactly how to do it when LGPL is
>> actually requiring modifications to be software libraries.
>
> What rights are hoping to allow people to take advantage of that
> are not available under the GPL?
The right to modify a non-library that is licensed under the
Library GPL. How can I satisty LGPL 2a) that says:
"The modified work must itself be a software library."
when the original clealry is not a software library?
Merijn
--
Remove +nospam to reply
- Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, John Hasler, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries,
Merijn de Weerd <=
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, John Hasler, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28