Re: GPL and inhouse use?

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   >> Right now the GPL makes a distinction for in-house code. Only if
   >> you distribute binaries do you have to share the source. I was
   >> just saying that that should change: also in-house code should
   >> be shared, once it's out of testing.
   >
   > Why should that change?

   Web services are going to replace software distributed on media.
   If anyone can use GPL software to offer a service to the public
   without having to share modifications, that blows free software
   right out of the water.

If you provide it on a website, then it isn't very in-house, it is
just pure distribution, and the GPL already handles that.