[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 08:51:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> I just can't see how Wallace could possibly lose on appeal.
Before "losing" he actually has to get a case open. His last attempt
was thrown out of court, remember? And you could not see how he could
_lose_ then, either. Let alone have his case thrown out.
You should offer to pay all his legal fees for a cut in the spoils you
are so sure he is about to receive.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Miles Bader, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17