Re: GPL licenced Java application using non GPL jars (libraries)

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > Moglen: We have made one clarification, as we see it, of what we
>> > believe was always the rule. We reasserted that code dynamically linked
>> > to GPL code--which the GPL code is intended to require, not merely
>> > optionally incorporate--is part of the source code of the work under
>> > the GPL and must be released.
>> >
>> > </quote>
>> >
>> > So much about "the GPL rejects any automatic aggregation of software
>> > copyrights" the FSF been telling to the Judge in court of law. To
>> > quote day5done,
>> 
>> Linking is not aggregation.
>
> Static linking certainly is.

Only in Terekhov-Lala-land.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum