Re: IBM's interpretation of the GNU GPL contract

[John Hasler]

rjack writes:
> IBM argues throughout its MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION that the GPL license
> is a contract.

It does not.  It argues that the terms of the GPL are to be interpreted
according to the rules of contract interpretation.

> Does this mean that the esteemed Eben Moglen, RMS and his faithful
> disciples have simply been blathering reams of FUD when claiming that the
> "The GPL is a License, Not a Contract"?

Where did you say you got your law degree?
-- 
John Hasler 
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA