[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License Dilemma
From: |
Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky |
Subject: |
Re: License Dilemma |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:25:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.4 |
John Hasler wrote:
> Dmitry writes:
>> That exactly what I am insist upon. Patents is just socially acceptable
>> instrument "To promote the progress of science and useful arts", by
>> securing exclusive rights to their respective owners.
>
> The point is that US law does not assert the existence of an inherent
> right of authors and inventors to control the propagation of their works.
> Instead it asserts that the _creation_ by law of such rights is in the
> public interest.
Of course, and as soon as another mutually
satisfiable model would be legitimized, we all
say "good buy" to patent system with little
regret.
Dmitry
- Re: License Dilemma, (continued)
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, John Hasler, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, John Hasler, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma,
Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky <=
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, David Kastrup, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29