Re: gpl licensing

[Alexander Terekhov]

Aragorn (registered Guh-NÜ-slash-Linux user #223157) wrote:
[...]
> The word "commercial" is thrown in by this person solely for the purpose of
> bloating his argument.  There is nothing in the GPL that states that
> software cannot be sold commercially, 

"So now they're going to try the hard work of cracking 'Freedom'. Free,
well that means stuff you don't pay for"

   -- Eben Moglen ("Moglen: How we'll kill the Microsoft Novell deal") 

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1139911511108
(Law.com - Meet the DotCommunist)