[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:44:59 +0000 |
oops, one more thread to the kill list.
Go drop dead rjack/Alex simbionte. I get confused, which double
personality are you now, really?
Conspiration-theory nuts like you only tend to bother people.
Qua, 2006-12-20 às 20:30 +0100, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Just a subject change. Unpaid GNUtian volunteers without money*** might
> want to notice and comment. TIA.
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >
> > [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/publications/msvatt.pdf]
> >
> > Toward the end, arch legal GNU beagle Eben eloquently states:
> >
> > "Thus, this Court's precedent repeatedly sets out that software, which
> > is nothing more than a set of instructions -- an algorithm -- to be
> > performed by a computer in order to solve some mathematical problem,
> > is ..."
> >
> > According to the US Copyright Office, Copyright protection is not
> > available for ideas, program logic, algorithms, systems, methods,
> > concepts, ...
> >
> > So... copyright protection is not available for software as defined by
> > arch legal GNU beagle Eben.
> >
> > GPL? Who is GPL?
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
> ***) http://www.ifso.ie/documents/rms-2004-05-24.html (courtesy of GNUtian
> ciaran: <http://google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/0ca99d760cb6903e>)
>
> "There are also certain software developers for whom getting a patent
> licence is extremely hard. We Free Software developers. You see Free
> Software has been so successful because we have shown we can develop
> software without any money. Volunteers do it. We don't need to have money
> to develop powerful large programs. But we certainly need to have money
> if we're going to buy patent licences."
>
> --
> "Join the boycott of Chinese products"
>
> -- www.stallman.org
> _______________________________________________
> gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
> gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", (continued)
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", rjack, 2006/12/18
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/19
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/20
- Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/20
- Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL, Miles Bader, 2006/12/22
- Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL, David Kastrup, 2006/12/23
- Re: Free Software Law Center and the FSF repudiated the GPL, Ben Pfaff, 2006/12/23
- Re: SFLC: "a penumbra", rjack, 2006/12/20
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- "GPLv3 would prevent MS/Novell", rjack, 2006/12/05