[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2007 08:59:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Tobin writes:
> But the GPL only covers distribution. Even if the original author has
> some of the responsibility for the act of creating the derivative
> in-memory image, the GPL does not apply to that act. If you don't
> distribute the derivative work, where does the GPL come into it?
The original author might be found liable for contributory infringement.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question,
John Hasler <=
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/23
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/23