[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Paolo Gianrossi |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 15:20:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Although I agree in concept and ethics with all the concepts expressed here, I
still don't get the point: AFAIK, at least in the EU, I hold copyright of
whatever thing my mind produces. It has nothing to do with being functional or
whatever. It's just if I make it, it's mine. So, why distributing non-GPL code
alone, which to be functional would need to be linked against GPLed code,
should be a copyright infringment? What if I said "Look! This is my attempt to
post-modern-digital poetry." or whatever...
This makes me confused..
paolino
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Paolo Gianrossi <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21