Re: GNU FUD

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
>> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Intellectual_property_law
>
>> actually no such thing, as there are disparate laws about the items
>> grouped under this term).  The problem is that he is completely unable
>> to draw any reasonable conclusions from his observations: his
>> predictions are consistently utterly wrong, and he blames this on
>> "drunk judges" and similar excuses.
>
> Do you really want to me post Easterbrook's summary of the GPL (his
> "quick look" on Wallace's claim aside for a moment) once again?
>
> I seem to recall that you *agreed* that Easterbrook was indeed
> "drunken" at least regarding his ability to comprehend the GPL.

Your recollections are rather colorful.  I am rather certain that I
said no such thing.  I might have differed in details with his
assessment and reasoning which is not all too surprising.  The bottom
line, however, seems to match pretty much what I would have expected.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum