[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale? |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:27:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org> writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>> That is perfectly acceptable and has nothing to do with copyright.
>> Copyright comes into play once you sell or otherwise transfer
>
> Copyright can come into play with the owner transferring a copy.
Where is the contradiction?
> For example if you display an original painting of yours and I
> photograph it without permission I infringe your copyright.
Last time I looked, the owner of a Michelangelo painting does not have
the copyright on the painting. He has, however, the power to
determine who may take photographs of it.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/06/01
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/06/02
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/06/02
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/06/02
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, John Hasler, 2007/06/02
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, John Hasler, 2007/06/02
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/04
- Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, John Hasler, 2007/06/04
Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, mike3, 2007/06/06
Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, mike3, 2007/06/06
Re: Did I finally figure out the rationale?, mike3, 2007/06/06