[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Software Patents
From: |
Bruce Lewis |
Subject: |
Re: Software Patents |
Date: |
19 Jun 2007 14:09:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
rjack <rjack@com> writes:
> This was an open invitation by the Supreme Court directed to Congress
> requesting that Congress simply do its job --- *LEGISLATE*.
Yes, but if Congress declines this invitation, then one should assume
that the Supreme Court's opinion that software is not patentable is
good-enough law.
Yes, I know a later lower-court opinion (In re Alappat) muddied things,
but that's for the Supreme Court to clear up, not Congress.
--
http://ourdoings.com/
Amazingly simple photo sharing
- Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/17
- Re: Software Patents, pltrgyst, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/18
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/18
Re: Software Patents,
Bruce Lewis <=
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/19
- Re: Software Patents, Bruce Lewis, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, dt, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/21