[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix". |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:32:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 16, 4:02 pm, Stephane CHAZELAS <this.addr...@is.invalid> wrote:
> 2007-10-16, 14:00(-07), mike3:
<snip>
> > Well, I could not check the recent SUS (Single UNIX Specification),
> > since to get a copy would cost $250 (!). I don't have that kind of
> > free
> > money on hand yet to blow on it.
>
> [...]
>
> ???
>
> SUSv3 can be freely browsed
> fromhttp://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm
> and downloaded fromhttp://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/download
>
> And you can even download a debian package with the full HTML
> doc for both susv2 and susv3 from any debian mirror.
>
I didn't see that. Thanks a lot.
> But it's true the CDROM version would cost $250 for some reason
> (?!).
>
<snip>
> >> There was an implementation:
> >> <http://www.gcom.com/linux/lis/>
>
> See also Fast-STREAMS (its replacement) from the openss7 project
> and there also exist commercial versions both in user and kernel
> space.
>
Hmm.
<snip>
> STREAMS is optional in SUS including for systems claiming XSI
> (X/Open System Interface).
> Seehttp://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/help/codes.html#XSRhttp://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap02.htm...
>
So then why all this stuff about it being needed for a libre
Unix system, anyway (or any Unix system, for that matter,
even proprietary)?
> --
> Stéphane
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., (continued)
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Paul Wallington, 2007/10/12
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/14
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Stephane CHAZELAS, 2007/10/18
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".,
mike3 <=
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Tim Smith, 2007/10/17