[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:15:56 +0100 (CET) |
>One does not call BSD using Mach for Mach, one calls it BSD.
I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one
doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard
people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them
refer to it as BSD.
Would be the first time I have heard it, and I have been mucking about
with Mach for quite sometime now. Then again, people insist that
tomatos are vegetables, and not fruits so I am not really suprised.
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Richard Tobin, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
Message not available