[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:07:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Tim Smith writes:
> The other way, which is the one I believe courts usually go with, is for
> the court to ask what would have happened if D had obeyed the actual
> license that D had.
He would not have received whatever benefits he received as a consequence
of not obeying the license. Those would go to the copyright owner, less
any direct expenses the infringer could prove, plus any damages the
copyright owner could prove.
This is all assuming, of course, that the copyright owner elects not to
demand statutory damages.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/11
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/11
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/13