Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record

[Alexander Terekhov]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
> The SFLC would actually be a even more profitable business if the GPL
> was unenforacble, they would sue anyone who distributes GPL software,
> since if the license is indeed invalid, you fall back on default
> copyright law, which is very restrictive.

You misread "invalid" to your advantage. Think about it for a minute,
ueber GNUtian ams.

Ready now?

Here's breaking news: "invalid" means that your invalid *demands* (not
permissions) are void, and the rest is just fine.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)