|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:58:38 -0500 |
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@arcor.de> wrote in message news:4980c39b$0$30239$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net...
On the one hand, it is exquisitly efficient that your silly carping can be applied to any topic without need for modification. On the other, it is still boring and uninteresting. How is it that you are amused by it? Can your mind be so small?amicus_curious wrote:"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message 85bptrnsam.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85bptrnsam.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...The recipient of GPLed software is free to declare the GPL void and revert to default copyright rules.What is at issue today, though, is the nature of such "default copyright rules". If there is no fee charged to use the work or to redistribute the work, the copyright can be ignored unless the author can show some degree of harm to himself.So copyright is just another issue you know absolutely nothing about --
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |