[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"
From: |
Andrew Halliwell |
Subject: |
Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception" |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:37:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.24-23-generic (i686)) |
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@despam-funkenbusch.com> wrote:
> Anyone with even a casual idea of how a c compiler works understands that
> the output of a compiler typically includes a certain amount of linked in
> code from the standard c runtime library, such as startup code, string
> handling routines, etc..
Indeed. and it should be noted that some commercial compilers have
restrictions on what you can do with your compiled code. some include a "not
for commercial use or sale" clause for example. (You have to buy a license
for that).
--
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/02/01
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception",
Andrew Halliwell <=
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/03
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/05
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/05
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/05