[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception" |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:50:11 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie writes:
> You're saying, I think, that this "boilerplate" code gives the
> boilerplate's writer some degree of copyright in the executable program.
> I'm not at all convinced o this. Certainly, the world doesn't seem to
> work this way in practice, in that if I write some code for a proprietary
> OS, and build it with proprietary tools, the tool vendors don't sue me
> for royalties.
They grant you a license. There once were compiler vendors who claimed
that you owed them a royalty for every copy of a program compiled with
their compilers.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", (continued)
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/07
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/06
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/06
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/07
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception",
John Hasler <=
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/07
- Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception", Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2009/02/06