Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
> license can steal their exclusive rights granted to
> them by under 17 USC 106.

What in the world are you talking about? How can a license
steal anything? The only way anyone's work falls under the
GPL is if they voluntarily place it under the GPL.

You seem very confused.