Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > Do you mean those BusyBox "copyright holders" who *cannot* go 
> > to federal court in the Second Circuit seeking redress because
> >  THEY HAVE NO REGISTERED COPYRIGHTS and therefore no standing
> > to sue?
>
> No judge has dismissed any of these cases yet for the copyright 
> holders not having standing.

ROFL. . . "no judge" huh? No judge has ever had a chance
to review anything because the SFLC always *voluntarily dismisses*
their own bullshit case before a judge can rule on anything.

THE SFLC WILL NEVER, NEVER VOLUNTARILY ALLOW A JUDGE TO REVIEW THE
MERITS OF THE GPL LICENSE. It's bullshit FSF propaganda Hymen. Which
part of b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a don't you understand?

> > Verizon told the SFLC to kiss their Tyrian purple ass and the 
> > SFLC filed a voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE so that Verizon
> >  wouldn't kick their dumb ass all over the courtroom.
>
> While this is what you wish is true, that does not make it true. 
> Meanwhile, Verizon's router supplier has a very prominent web 
> page which makes the sources available and prominently features 
> icons of the free software movement.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)