Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Thufir Hawat]

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:34:48 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

> I said that I think that it should not have copyright protection not
> that it doesn't have it.  That would require a change to the law, eh? 
> But then there wouldn't be any issue for the SFLC to sue over either. 
> If you somehow got a hold of Microsoft's source, you would be able to
> use it, too.


Are you aware that (old versions) of Windows source are out there?  Your 
wish is just pie-in-the sky.  This whole thing goes back to visicalc, I 
believe.


-Thufir