[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..
From: |
Doctor Smith |
Subject: |
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .. |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:17:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 |
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:14:41 +0000 (UTC), Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@ols.net> writes:
>
>>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:40:58 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>>>> Would that exempt them from litigation? IANAL, so I find this suggestion
>>>> curious.
>
>> Also, what on earth is I ANAL ???
>
> IANAL is a standard Usenet abbreviation for "I am not a lawyer". It's
> been around for donkey's years, HTH :-).
But...Roy Schestowitz always seems to write:
"I ANAL"
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., (continued)
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., chrisv, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Rjack, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Ezekiel, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., RonB, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..,
Doctor Smith <=
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., amicus_curious, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Tim Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., AES, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Tim Smith, 2009/03/07