[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:42:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> Rjack wrote:
>> Never in his wildest dreams will a GPL licensor control software
>> patents he *doesn't* own with a copyright grant that he does own
>
> Of course not. A GPL licensor only controls software patents that
> he *does* own. He grants free use of those patents required for
> the software that he distributes.
>
> Why do you think anyone is trying to control software patents that
> they don't own?
I think he is just confusing the realms of control. If I own a house,
that does not give me control over the bricks of my neighbor. But that
does not imply that he is free to throw the bricks through my window.
Not because I am in control of the bricks, but of the window.
--
David Kastrup
- TomTom, the GPL and patents, Rjack, 2009/03/10
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/10
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Rjack, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Rjack, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, John Hasler, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Rjack, 2009/03/11
- Re: TomTom, the GPL and patents, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11